Law firm for cable pooling and shared infrastructure

What this matter requires of counsel

1. Starts by classifying the sharing model

   A storage unit operating through the installation of a final customer and a separate generating unit behind a shared connection are legally different arrangements. Classifying the model has to come before drafting the agreement, because the scope of the whole documentation follows from it.

2. Matches legal title against technical parameters

   Ownership of the installations, title to the land and to the shared equipment, capacity, ownership boundaries and metering points all have to line up. Counsel who works from the connection documents and the single-line diagram drafts terms that match the plant as actually built.

3. Separates the grid operator relationship from the arrangements between participants

   The agreement between participants governs the funding of construction and repairs, cost allocation, failures, curtailment of output and the split of any compensation. That internal allocation does not narrow the rights of the grid operator, so both levels belong in the documentation as separate layers.

4. Provides for a participant leaving the arrangement

   A sale of the installation, a change of participant and the end of operation each lead to different settlements. The agreement should set out in advance how expenditure is settled, how closing meter readings are taken, how equipment is removed and what further access to the infrastructure looks like.

Further described matters are listed under our track record.