The discontinuation of enforcement proceedings results in their complete termination and the annulment of any enforcement measures already taken. However, this does not mean that the debt is written off, nor does it prevent enforcement proceedings from being initiated again in the future. The creditor retains the right to demand repayment of the debt.
When are enforcement proceedings discontinued?
The provisions governing enforcement proceedings in the Code of Civil Procedure provide for two ways of discontinuing enforcement proceedings – ex officio or upon application.
In the case of judicial enforcement, the general rule is that such proceedings are initiated upon application – in most cases, the creditor’s application is an absolute prerequisite for enforcement, meaning that the withdrawal of the application obliges the authority to discontinue the enforcement proceedings in accordance with the creditor’s wishes.
Exceptionally, enforcement proceedings may be discontinued at the debtor’s request, provided that the claim covered by the enforcement order had become time-barred before the date of filing the application to initiate enforcement, and the creditor has not demonstrated that an event interrupting the limitation period has occurred.
Enforcement proceedings may also be discontinued on application if the creditor holds a pledge securing full satisfaction of the claim being enforced, unless the enforcement is directed at the pledged asset. In practice, this means that the creditor may again apply for enforcement against assets other than the subject of the pledge, including those in respect of which the enforcement authority has previously discontinued enforcement proceedings.
There are further grounds for the ex officio discontinuation of enforcement proceedings, which are governed by Article 824 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Pursuant to the aforementioned provision, proceedings must be discontinued, inter alia, where the creditor or debtor lacks legal capacity, when the costs of enforcement proceedings would exceed the amount recovered through enforcement, or when enforcement is directed at property exempt from enforcement under specific provisions or a court ruling. The latter example necessitates the discontinuation of enforcement in any case where it would involve the attachment of, for example, maintenance payments or social assistance benefits.
The effect of discontinuing enforcement proceedings
The effect of discontinuing enforcement proceedings, in the form of the revocation of actions already taken, covers all enforcement measures – including the seizure of fines imposed on the debtor and not yet paid, as well as the absolute necessity to remove from the land register any entry regarding the initiation of enforcement proceedings against the property.
Once the decision to discontinue the proceedings becomes final, the debtor regains the ability to freely dispose of the assets against which enforcement was directed.
The discontinuation of enforcement proceedings at the creditor’s request is further distinguished by the fact that, as a consequence, the order issued during the proceedings awarding the creditor legal costs from the debtor is set aside.
Among the consequences of discontinuance, it should also be noted that enforcement proceedings may only be recommenced once the cause for which the proceedings were discontinued has ceased to exist. In exceptional circumstances, however, this period may be strictly defined.
One such case is regulated by Article 985 § 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure. It concerns circumstances in which enforcement proceedings are discontinued when, following the second auction, the property has still not been sold and none of the creditors has taken ownership of it. Dismissal under Article 985(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure means that new enforcement proceedings against the property may only be initiated after a period of six months has elapsed from the date of the second auction.
In the context of the consequences of the discontinuation of enforcement proceedings, it is also important to bear in mind that the limitation period, which was originally interrupted upon the commencement of enforcement proceedings, begins to run anew. This is significant from the perspective of both the creditor and the debtor, as once the limitation period has expired, the debt becomes a so-called ‘natural obligation’. This means that whilst the creditor may seek enforcement of the debt owed to them in court, if the debtor raises a defence of limitation, the claim will be dismissed in any event.
Rights acquired by third parties
If the enforcement proceedings conducted to date have led to third parties acquiring certain rights (e.g. the right of ownership of property acquired by a successful bidder), then even the discontinuation of such proceedings cannot lead to a breach of the rights acquired by those persons. Once the decision to discontinue enforcement proceedings becomes final, the bailiff is obliged to notify third parties whose rights and obligations were affected by the attachment of the lifting of the attachment.
Summary
In summary, the discontinuation of enforcement proceedings, regardless of whether it was carried out ex officio or upon application, results in the automatic revocation of the enforcement measures taken and the restoration of the debtor’s assets to their state prior to the seizure. Once the obstacle has been removed, enforcement proceedings may be recommenced unless enforcement is not permissible for other reasons. Actions taken in the discontinued proceedings do not have procedural effects in the new proceedings, unless specific provisions provide otherwise.
Frequently asked questions
Does discontinuation of enforcement proceedings mean that my debt has been completely forgiven?
No, discontinuation of proceedings means only its termination and revocation of actions taken, but the debt remains to be paid. The creditor still has the right to demand fulfillment of the obligation and may initiate enforcement again in the future. The limitation period for the claim begins to run anew from the moment the decision on discontinuation becomes final.
In what situations can a court or bailiff discontinue enforcement ex officio?
Ex officio discontinuation occurs, among others, when parties lack legal capacity or when the costs of proceedings would exceed the sum to be recovered. Discontinuation is also mandatory if enforcement is directed at items excluded from enforcement, such as alimony benefits or social assistance allowances.
Can I file a motion to discontinue enforcement if the debt has already become time-barred before its initiation?
Yes, the debtor may file a motion for discontinuation if the limitation of the claim occurred before the date of enforcement initiation. In such case, the creditor must demonstrate that an event interrupting the limitation period occurred, otherwise the enforcement authority will discontinue the proceedings in accordance with the debtor’s will.
What happens to the seizure on my real estate after discontinuation of proceedings?
Upon the decision on discontinuation becoming final, all seizures are revoked, including the entry in the land register concerning the initiated proceedings. You regain full ability to freely dispose of the real estate, and the bailiff is obligated to notify third parties whose rights were affected by the seizure about its revocation.
When can I initiate enforcement again after its discontinuation due to failure to sell real estate at auction?
If proceedings were discontinued because the real estate was not sold after the second auction, new enforcement can be initiated only after six months have elapsed from the date of that auction. This is a special case where the time limit for re-initiating proceedings is strictly defined by law.
A dispute or proceedings on the horizon?
That is where most conversations with a lawyer begin. A consultation is paid, PLN 600 net. You pay for a real opinion: whether you have a legal problem, what you can do about it and roughly what it costs. It ties you to nothing further, and you do not need to know the law, that part is on us.
- 1 Talk
You tell us what is going on, in your own words.
- 2 What next
We tell you your options and what it costs.
- 3 We act
You give the go-ahead and the matter is ours.
HWW Hewelt Wojnowski Lindner i Wspólnicy is a Warsaw law firm advising businesses and public entities. We combine experience in commercial law, energy, tax, data protection and litigation to deliver solutions tailored to our clients’ business realities.
About the firm →
