Who this is for and when
The service is addressed above all to investors and project companies facing delay, non-completion or defective performance of a PV, wind or storage project. A contractor who has received a penalty demand, or who points to a lack of cooperation from the investor, can also refer the matter. Whether the engagement can be accepted, and which side is represented, is settled before the cooperation starts.
It is worth raising the problem before an amendment postponing the completion date is signed, before the final settlement is agreed and before the crew is changed. Where a claim, a payment order or a demand with a deadline has been received, the date of receipt should be given. Where a warranty is expiring, its expiry date matters. That information determines the urgency and the possible scope.
What the analysis delivers
The deliverable can be a written assessment covering the chronology of events, the basis of the claims, a list of evidence gaps and a recommended order of action. The available options are compared against the goal for the project: completing it, recovering costs or ending the cooperation. We indicate which questions call for technical findings, further documents or a separate business decision.
The agreed scope may cover the review of the contract and of liability for delay, the basis of contractual penalties and liability caps, the grounds for withdrawal and the warranty terms, the need to secure evidence or claims, drafts of a demand letter, a response, an amendment or a settlement, and the conduct of negotiations. Court or arbitration representation is a separately agreed stage. A quotation is not an opinion on the merits of a claim, and no particular recovery, interim relief or timing is promised.